In context: For heaps of DIY PC followers, dual-core desktop CPUs could possibly even merely seem as remnants of a bygone skills, but both Intel and AMD persist in offering entry-level processors equipped with ideal a pair of cores. The Intel 300 stands out as one in every of the most up-to-date dual-core desktop CPUs within the marketplace, with the firm positioning it as a successor to the Pentium Gold G7400.
Intel rebranded the Pentium to be is named the “Intel 300,” but gaming benchmarks printed by YouTube channel PC Gawk indicate that its efficiency is nice as underwhelming as that of the older Pentium chip. The channel tested a pair of video games with the unique CPU and chanced on it unable to compare up to a runt extra expensive quad-core chips, treasure the Core i3-14100.
In Cinebench 2024, the Intel 300 notched up a meager 88 facets within the single-core test and 216 facets within the multi-core benchmark, corresponding to the older G7400, which scored 84 and 213 facets, respectively. These numbers are much lower than the Core i3-14100, which managed to rack up 102 and 490 facets, respectively.
With in fashion DirectX 12 gaming titles nerve-racking a pair of cores, the 300 furthermore lagged within the assist of the i3-14100 in gaming benchmarks. In Call of Accountability (1080p, RS100%), the Intel 300 carried out a rather reputable practical of 94 frames per 2d, however the i3-14100 reached a much smoother 153 fps. In Cyberpunk 2077, the 300 could possibly most effective pause a median of 56 fps, whereas the Core i3-14100 notched up a much extra spectacular 127 frames.
Equivalent outcomes were noticed in varied benchmarking tools and third-occasion apps, including CrossMark, the photo editing benchmark UL Procyon, and Handbrake, all of which as soon as again proved that two cores are ideal now not ample to proceed most in fashion capabilities circa 2024.
The Intel 300 CPU is a Raptor Lake processor that includes two Raptor Cove P-cores and four threads. It’s some distance clocked at up to a pair.9GHz, aspects 6 MB of L3 cache (3 MB per core), and has a 46W TDP. It has an MSRP between $77 and $87, which is a tad lower than that of the $125 Core i3-14100F (with no integrated graphics). Nonetheless, given the acute efficiency compromises, you’d also very wisely be better off with the quad-core chip if gaming is your priority.