TECHNOLOGY

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown in overview: Computer and desktop benchmarks

An unexpected success. Ubisoft revives a time-honoured sport sequence with Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown, which has been smartly-received by each customers and the press. Our benchmark examine clarifies whether or no longer the hardware necessities are also convincing.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Carmen Pol), Printed 🇩🇪

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

We on the moment enact our gaming benchmarks with these devices. Clicking on the person pictures will bewitch you to the respective producer’s web pages. Extra vital aspects on the devices’ specs are listed on the cease of the article.

The Lost Crown, comparable to the fresh Prince of Persia, is a aspect-scroller that blends bounce-and-sail aspects with wrestle segments. The builders possess chosen a appetizing humorous peep, which rather compensates for the rather modest textures.

In terms of gameplay, the title performs admirably. Noteworthy are the tender controls and the effective wrestle plot

Ubisoft takes a reserved contrivance to graphics alternate choices. Other than the image mode and resolution, basically one of one of the best adjustable settings are edge smoothing (FXAA or SMAA) and graphics quality (Odd, Excessive, Ultra). Presets are no longer explicitly outlined, as there are no longer any individual or detailed alternate choices readily available. On the opposite hand, VSync and an FPS restrict will also be optionally activated

Pro: All customizations bewitch discontinuance with out requiring a restart. Notably, well-liked functions like DLSS or FSR are absent. Then again, given the exceptionally low plot necessities, these functions wouldn’t be most important, even on less extremely effective systems

For our measurements, we sed the free demo version, which is roughly 10 GB in dimension. Since The Lost Crown, unlike most Ubisoft games, lacks an built-in benchmark, we employed our have sequence. The employ of the CapFrameX instrument, we captured a sail lasting real over 20 seconds straight after launching the game (see video).

The Lost Crown is remarkably ambiance friendly by contrivance of graphics energy. Even a Radeon 780M can tackle the title at 1,920 x 1,080 resolution and most important aspects, reaching round 100 FPS.

    1920×1080 Odd Preset     1920×1080 Excessive Preset AA:FX     1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




359 (32min, 247P0.1, 328P1) fps ∼100%




359 (29.6min, 259P0.1, 324P1) fps ∼100%




359 (27.3min, 268P0.1, 327P1) fps ∼100%

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




358 (21.8min, 245P0.1, 319P1) fps ∼100%




358 (21.4min, 198.4P0.1, 315P1) fps ∼100%




358 (21.4min, 232P0.1, 319P1) fps ∼100%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Computer GPU, i9-13900H

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16




356 (23.8min, 84.2P0.1, 292P1) fps ∼99%




356 (26.1min, 91.2P0.1, 261P1) fps ∼99%




356 (25min, 88.7P0.1, 287P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Computer GPU, i9-13950HX

Razer Blade 16 Mid 23




357 (22.4min, 129.9P0.1, 289P1) fps ∼99%




356 (22.7min, 89.5P0.1, 281P1) fps ∼99%




356 (22.5min, 110.3P0.1, 276P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Computer GPU, i9-13900HX

XMG Pro 15 E23




358 (19.5min, 194.2P0.1, 299P1) fps ∼100%




358 (18.9min, 220P0.1, 306P1) fps ∼100%




357 (21min, 186.1P0.1, 294P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Computer GPU, R9 7940HS

Razer Blade 14 Mid 23




352 (17.4min, 137.7P0.1, 254P1) fps ∼98%




350 (17.8min, 126.4P0.1, 235P1) fps ∼97%




348 (17.5min, 92.7P0.1, 233P1) fps ∼97%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Computer GPU, i7-13700H

Medion Erazer Scout E20




358 (22.2min, 216P0.1, 308P1) fps ∼100%




357 (18.7min, 172.7P0.1, 300P1) fps ∼99%




353 (23.4min, 182.8P0.1, 251P1) fps ∼98%

AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS

Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16




356 (17.3min, 198.3P0.1, 287P1) fps ∼99%




353 (17.7min, 179.7P0.1, 250P1) fps ∼98%




340 (1.665min, 138.1P0.1, 248P1) fps ∼95%

AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS

Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16




141.1 (15.8min, 42.1P0.1, 101.7P1) fps ∼39%




106.2 (14.4min, 15.4P0.1, 70P1) fps ∼30%




105.3 (15min, 33.3P0.1, 74.9P1) fps ∼29%

Even at QHD resolution, a dedicated gaming GPU is no longer any longer very vital. Mid-range objects, such because the GeForce RTX 4050 or the Radeon RX 7600S, discontinuance three-digit FPS at 2,560 x 1,440 pixels with the Ultra Preset.

    2560×1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




359 (27.2min, 235P0.1, 330P1) fps ∼100%

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




358 (21.3min, 241P0.1, 316P1) fps ∼100%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Computer GPU, i9-13900H

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16




356 (23.9min, 79.5P0.1, 260P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Computer GPU, i9-13950HX

Razer Blade 16 Mid 23




355 (22.3min, 106.2P0.1, 255P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Computer GPU, i9-13900HX

XMG Pro 15 E23




354 (18.9min, 190.3P0.1, 305P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Computer GPU, R9 7940HS

Razer Blade 14 Mid 23




307 (17.3min, 140.3P0.1, 212P1) fps ∼86%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Computer GPU, i7-13700H

Medion Erazer Scout E20




290 (19min) fps ∼81%

AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS

Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16




276 (16.3min, 163.2P0.1, 206P1) fps ∼77%

A an identical scenario unfolds in 4K. Mid-range chips with out anguish render 3,840 x 2,160 pixels and fat settings on the display conceal conceal.

    3840×2160 Ultra Preset AA:SM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




358 (24.6min, 256P0.1, 323P1) fps ∼100%

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K

Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F




356 (21.8min, 91.8P0.1, 312P1) fps ∼99%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Computer GPU, i9-13900H

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16




315 (21.4min, 101.6P0.1, 229P1) fps ∼88%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Computer GPU, i9-13950HX

Razer Blade 16 Mid 23




289 (21.4min, 79.8P0.1, 209P1) fps ∼81%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Computer GPU, i9-13900HX

XMG Pro 15 E23




186.7 (18.9min, 73.7P0.1, 150.5P1) fps ∼52%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Computer GPU, R9 7940HS

Razer Blade 14 Mid 23




157.8 (15.3min, 55.9P0.1, 119P1) fps ∼44%

AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS

Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16




130.4 (15.1min, 32.4P0.1, 101.1P1) fps ∼36%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Computer GPU, i7-13700H

Medion Erazer Scout E20




127.1 (18.5min, 69.3P0.1, 99.8P1) fps ∼36%

(-) Smaller values are better. / n123 Series of benchmarks for this median price / Approximate characteristic

Tale
5 Stutters – This sport is amazingly seemingly to exclaim and possess unfortunate frame rates. Essentially based totally on all identified benchmarks the usage of the required graphical settings, moderate frame rates are expected to tumble below 25fps
Could most likely merely Bellow – This graphics card has no longer been explicitly examined on this sport. Essentially based totally on interpolated records from surrounding graphics playing cards of an identical performance levels, stutters and unfortunate frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Essentially based totally on all identified benchmarks the usage of the required graphical settings, this sport would possibly possibly merely restful sail at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Essentially based totally on all identified benchmarks the usage of the required graphical settings, this sport would possibly possibly merely restful sail at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Essentially based totally on all identified benchmarks the usage of the required graphical settings, this sport would possibly possibly merely restful sail at or above 58fps
Could most likely merely Hump Fluently – This graphics card has no longer been explicitly examined on this sport. Essentially based totally on interpolated records from surrounding graphics playing cards of an identical performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Unsure – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance considerations real by attempting out for this sport. A slower card would be in a characteristic to full better and extra consistent frame rates than this explicit GPU working the identical benchmark scene.
Unsure – This graphics card has no longer been explicitly examined on this sport and no reliable interpolation will also be made per the performances of surrounding playing cards of the identical class or family.
The price within the fields shows the moderate frame rate of all values within the database. Proceed your cursor over the price to sight individual outcomes.

 Cns

Notebook Graphics card Processor RAM
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Tower-PC Graphics card Processor RAM
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K display screen Running plot Nvidia driver AMD driver
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900 Home windows 11 ForceWare 546.65 Adrenalin 23.12.1

Florian Glaser, 2024-01-25 (Update: 2024-01-25)

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button