‘So faulty’: Justin Thomas presents scathing verdict on prospect of shorter ball

Justin Thomas has hit out at the proposal for a shorter ball to be used in elite competitions (Gareth Fuller/PA) (PA Archive)

Justin Thomas has hit out on the proposal for a shorter ball to be feeble in elite competitions (Gareth Fuller/PA) (PA Archive)

Justin Thomas believes the chance of a shorter ball being feeble in elite competition is “so faulty” for golf and has criticised the “aesthetic egocentric choices” made by one of the famous sport’s governing our bodies.

The R&A and USGA said in February 2020 that they meant to “destroy the ever-growing cycle of hitting distance” and on Tuesday presented the proposal of a Model Local Rule (MLR) to present tournament organisers the chance to require the utilization of balls which would possibly hurry around 15 yards less.

R&A main govt Martin Slumbers and USGA counterpart Mike Whan confirmed that the MLR would be feeble in their very safe elite occasions, most particularly the Starting up Championship and US Starting up respectively.

On the replacement hand, the PGA Tour didn’t without lengthen relieve the proposal with top tools manufacturing firm Acushnet, which produces the Titleist balls feeble by Thomas, claiming it would flip relieve the game 30 years.

“My response became upset and additionally no longer bowled over, to be true,” ragged world no 1 Thomas said in a press convention earlier than the Valspar Championship.

“I mediate the USGA over time has in my eyes, it’s harsh, however made some aesthetic egocentric choices. They positively, in my mind, comprise achieved a mode of things that aren’t for the betterment of the game, although they claim it.

“I don’t impress the contrivance in which it’s growing the game. For them to thunder within the identical sentence that golf is within the supreme internet web page online it’s ever been, all the pieces is famous, however…

“And I’m admire, ‘successfully, there shouldn’t be a however. You’re attempting to form a solution for a explain that doesn’t exist’. To me, it’s true so faulty for the game of golf.

“I imply, about a of the famous things to me is the truth that it’s seemingly you’ll perhaps well play the specific same golf ball that I play. I imply, that’s frigid. For an day after day newbie golfer, it’s very distinctive that we’re in a train to play the specific same tools.

“Yeah, I impress that I’m able to comprise a determined grind on a wedge, no topic you admire to resolve on to name it, however it’s seemingly you’ll perhaps well inch to the professional store and resolve the identical golf ball that I play or Scottie Scheffler performs or no topic.

“However the USGA needs to bring it to a level where that’s no longer the case. They want it to be, ‘OK, successfully, the professionals play this contrivance and the amateurs play this contrivance’ and I true don’t impress how that’s better for the game of golf.

“The quantity of money and time that these producers comprise spent attempting to form the supreme product doable and now you’re going to expose them and us that now we comprise got to delivery over for potentially – if the PGA Tour, PGA of The US don’t undertake this native rule – two of the four greatest occasions of the twelve months, we’re going to resolve on to exercise a determined ball?”

If the views of Thomas are extensively reflected amongst his fellow professionals it would appear no longer seemingly that the PGA Tour would agree to undertake the MLR earlier than its meant introduction in January 2026.

And the 2-time foremost winner suggested that would possibly well lead to a carve up between the governing our bodies and the Tour.

“Why are this group of name it five to 15-handicap amateurs figuring out the guidelines of golf for professional golfers or why are they pronouncing that now we comprise got to attain something?” Thomas added.

“So is it something where down the avenue where it’s admire, you know what, then elegant, in case you admire to resolve on to trade something essentially essentially essentially based off of your knowledge that we feel admire is aesthetic biased and fallacious and self-centred to what you specialize in in, then presumably we’ll true form our safe or we’ll attain our safe thing.

“I don’t know where the Tour stands on that. I’m able to’t order on behalf of what they’re planning on doing. However to my knowledge, they haven’t essentially been on board with it or looking out to pursue rolling the ball relieve.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button